There were no apologies for absence.

The notes of the meeting on 2 November 2011 were agreed and signed.

Discussion on Members’ Recommendations.

Proposed recommendations were discussed at the Task Group’s previous meeting on 2 November 2011.  These proposals are attached. 

The Chair asked the Committee whether they had any changes or amendments to make to the list of Proposed Recommendations.

Recommendation 1 – ’30 minute bays’

The Chair informed the meeting that she had visited other hospitals where signage for ‘free’ parking was more visible than at Watford. 

Recommendation 5 – Concession Information/User Booklet

One Member recommended that the dissemination of information on concessions should be more pro-active; at present it appeared that users were expected to request this information rather than be offered. 

The Chair stressed that staff in wards did not have the time to look for users who might require this information.  She reiterated the need for a booklet which included information on available concessions.  

A Member suggested that the term ‘main carer’ should be used in order to make the information clear. 

Recommendation 6 - £2.50 charge

Members agreed that to start payment at a two hour stay for £2.50 would result in extra revenue from the car park.  It was noted that visitors who were leaving currently passed tickets on to drivers who were just arriving at the car park; this resulted in a loss of payment.  It was felt that a lower charge for less time would be more acceptable for visitors; there would also be less ‘time’ left on a ticket making it less likely that this would be passed on. 

One Member noted that a lower charge would also result in less ‘free’ parking in neighbouring residential streets.  

Recommendation 7 – exit onto Vicarage Road

One Member considered that this Recommendation should be drafted as a ‘suggestion’ rather than as a Recommendation. 

Recommendation 8 – Survey of Parking Charges

One Member drew attention to parking costs for staff at the hospital which were relatively low.  He reminded Members that the Directors had explained that parking costs were such as to balance expenditure against income.  The Member advised it would be wise to balance the relative costs of staff and visitors to the hospital more equably. 

The Member agreed that revenue was needed and that there should be balance within the accounts but questioned whether it was fair that the public charge was so high compared to that of the staff.  He suggested that the whole system of charging should be re-considered.

Another Member reminded the meeting that the Directors had advised that the Hospital Management would be looking at charges for staff in the future. 

Members discussed their support for this review which it was hoped would ensure an overall balance in charges for all users.  

A further Member advocated a ‘progressive’ charging system for staff; he agreed that stakeholders should be consulted on parking costs. 

A Member advised that the report should make mention of the Task Group’s support of the review of staff parking charges and to ask that it ensured that charges for staff were progressive in order to protect lower paid staff.   

The Task Group discussed the use of public transport in lieu of driving to the  ...  view the full minutes text for item 16.

Patient Advice and Liaison Service

The Patient Advice and Liaison Service (PALS) representative had asked for feedback on the information he had passed on to the Task Group.

Members agreed that the information he had supplied had been helpful and that thanks should be forwarded to him. 

ACTION: Committee and Scrutiny Support Officer

It was agreed that the PALS representative would be forwarded a copy of the report and that he should be advised that he could attend the Overview and Scrutiny meeting on 2^nd February 2012. 

Date of next meeting

The next meeting to be on Wednesday 4^th January 2012.